The post mRNA Vaccines Being Undermined By U.S. Public Health Authorities Despite Known Successes appeared first on Techso Mogro.
]]>Kennedy cites 375 “studies” by anti-vaxxers to support his conclusions. His HHS board is populated with anti-vaxxers who appear to be particularly hostile to mRNA research. The result has been the cancellation of US$ 500 million in federal government funding for mRNA vaccine research. Yet, Kennedy’s Health and Human Services (HHS) is hailing other vaccine research programs, even with his and their anti-vaxxer rhetoric.
The following lists current vaccine research being funded by HHS.
The research programs HHS is funding are well-intentioned, but targeting and defunding mRNA as a villain is a big mistake. The biggest advantage that mRNA brings to fighting disease is speed. With COVID-19, mRNA vaccines have shown they are faster to develop, produce in volume and deploy. mRNA vaccines can be designed and manufactured in a few weeks.
The aforementioned whole virus, gold standard and synthetic antigen vaccines require months to culture and produce. In light of the immediacy of the COVID-19 pandemic, relying on the currently funded HHS vaccine research programs would have led to many more infections, hospitalizations, and deaths.
Having said this, mRNA vaccines do have three downsides. These include:
An October 22, 2025, article in Nature describes an unforeseen upside. The vaccines given to fight COVID-19 have revved up immune systems to train them to kill cancers. Adam Grippin, a radiation oncologist at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, stated, “The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine acts like a siren and activates the immune system throughout the entire body.” When asked to comment on the vaccine programming the body to kill lung cancer and melanoma, HHS had nothing to say.
Meanwhile, the Nature article reported a near doubling of survival times for those who had COVID-19 mRNA vaccines compared to the unvaccinated with cancer. The same results were not observed in cancer patients who had received non-mRNA vaccines.
Steven Lin, an oncologist at MD Anderson, in Nature describes the impact the decision by Kennedy’s HHS to defund mRNA research has had. He notes, “The current climate impacts patients because even the word mRNA has stigma these days. We’re walking on eggshells because there’s so much negative publicity about mRNA.”
mRNA defunding has impacted an mRNA cancer vaccine trial aimed at treating melanoma, pancreatic and other tumours. It has also impacted mRNA vaccine development aimed at treating Zika and rabies.
Bill Hanage, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, in an article published on the school’s website on September 25, 2025, describes the HHS decision as “short-sighted, ignoring the short-term benefit the mRNA vaccines provide when meeting a medical threat like the COVID-19 pandemic. He states, “We should be acutely aware of the number of different infectious threats that can be thrown at us, and once you’ve got a really great new tool in your toolkit, why would you throw it away? Why would you turn your back on mRNA technology when it’s helped us so much?”
Hanage talks about the myocarditis risk, stating that “the risks of getting COVID are worse than the vaccine,” noting that it was hundreds of thousands of doses given before rare incidents of negative reactions to it were described. Hanage also points out that pulling the funding from mRNA vaccine research means that studying why the vaccines caused these rare reactions to occur will now go by the wayside and remain undiscovered. Hanage concludes, “There is no upside,” and that we will be “fighting any future pandemic with one hand tied behind our back.”
The post mRNA Vaccines Being Undermined By U.S. Public Health Authorities Despite Known Successes appeared first on Techso Mogro.
]]>