The report makes many specific recommendations addressing issues I describe in many of my postings written here at Techso Mogro blog. I have selected five to share with you:
Pascal Lamy, former Director-General of the World Trade Organization, and the chairman for this report states, “20th century structures and institutions are poorly equipped for 21st century challenges…organised along out of date geopolitical lines, where those with a diminishing stake retain disproportionate power.” Lamy is talking here about the revamping of global structures for governance in making this statement, questioning the relevance of the present mix of institutions like the UN Security Council and asking if power to make decisions should be redistributed so that all humanity isn’t put at peril by political gridlock on issues of global consequence such as climate change.
In the Executive Summary of the report it concludes with the following: “Now for the Long Term aims to stimulate action and debate. Commissioners look forward to engaging with governments, businesses, NGOs and civil society in order to take these ideas and recommendations forward in the months and years ahead.”
So for me the take away action is to ensure the widest dissemination of the content of this report. I urge you as readers of Techso Mogro blog to make others aware, email, text and Twitter about it. Post a link on your Facebook and LinkedIn pages. If you are politically active engage your local riding association, your congressman, member of parliament, city councilor, state or provincial representative. Make them aware. Talk about it with business colleagues. Organize meetups. Otherwise this Commission’s efforts will be unheard and none of what it proposes will be acted upon.
]]>
Dr. Martin would have liked the subject of today’s posting. It is something he anticipated through the convergence of artificial intelligence, wireless telecommunications and cars. The terminology describes all of this as vehicle-to-vehicle communication. But it is more than that. In the age of the Internet of Things, not just vehicles can talk to each other. So can the roads, signs and other transportation infrastructure get involved in the conversation. What this inevitably means is higher degrees of safety, less use of fossil fuels, and less polluting carbon.
Rsearch is being done at UMTRI short for University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. Its goal is summed up by Director Peter Sweatman who states:
“Integrating the most promising approaches to mobility into a coordinated system could reduce motor vehicle fatalities and injuries as well as energy consumption and carbon emissions by as much as a factor of ten….we also estimate that freight transportation costs could be cut by a factor of three, and the need for parking could go down by a factor of three.”
To achieve these welcome results UMTRI in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation is conducting the largest real-world experiment involving vehicle-to-vehicle communication in Ann Arbor, Michigan. This is ongoing right now and involves ordinary drivers who have lent 2,800 vehicles to the project, a mix of cars, trucks, buses, motorcycles and bicycles. All have been fitted with short-range transmitters and receivers that can broadcast a signal approximately 300 meters (1,000 feet). The connection is through specialized Wi-Fi operating at 5.9-Gigahertz on a network designed specifically for vehicles on the move. Not all the vehicles in the test are outfitted equally. Some just broadcast information to other vehicles in the moving network. Others though will receive warnings based on what is happening to cars and other vehicles in their immediate vicinity. For example, if a car a few vehicles ahead suddenly brakes, a car that receives warnings will see a dashboard alert appear.
This type of vehicle-to-vehicle information sharing has enormous implications. Internetworked cars can eliminate transportation bottlenecks by adjusting speeds to optimize traffic flow. Internetworked cars can anticipate and avoid collisions. And optimizing vehicle flow can reduce carbon emissions and fuel consumption, both highly desirable outcomes. The first results will be published in August of this year.
UMTRI is not alone in developing a standard for vehicle-to-vehicle communication. Google has been experimenting with autonomous vehicles that interact without human intervention. And in Europe, Car2Car represents an attempt to create an open standard for internetworking the transportation infrastructure. Add to this mix smart highways such as those being developed in the Netherlands and you have a formula for greater vehicle safety, energy savings and reduced polluting greenhouse gases. It’s hard not to want to jump on this bandwagon. I think Dr. Martin would have approved.
]]>
Back in the 1970s, James Martin, the futurist and telecommunications guru, described in his book, The Wired Society, a scenario in which a patient would be pre-screened before being seen by a doctor. The pre-screening involved the patient answering a series of questions that appeared on a computer screen and based on the answer the computer would then choose the next question to ask. The program resembled a large decision tree with branches going off in all directions based on how each patient responded. In the end the computer could narrow down the investigation and advise medical staff in a report. This concept preceded the existence of the Internet and the availability of massive amounts of information from which a human or computer intelligence could draw.
Today anyone with access to the Internet can visit medical websites like WebMD, or NetDoctor and look up symptoms to try and do self-diagnosis. These sites and the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, are filled with information. What they lack is a screening mechanism in the form of an intelligent front end that can interact with the information seeker based on an understanding of symptoms and implications. Back when James Martin was writing, medical artificial intelligence was in its infancy. The systems used symbolic models of disease and related them to what the patient was describing. Today’s artificial intelligence systems, however, employ neural network architecture and can draw on vast data resources in offering an opinion on a diagnosis.

Combined with widespread use of electronic medical records and surgical medical robotics, the age of the machine and the iDoctor is near at hand. Will patients be better off getting diagnosed by a machine rather than a human MD? An artificial intelligence-based medical system will be cheaper than one that is human-based. It will be more individually focused having access to a patient’s DNA profile and medical history. This will take subjective human opinion out of the mix. It will be able to interact, read and even adjust any broadcast capable medical devices used by a patient, whether a smartphone ECG reader that the patient uses regularly, or blood sugar home testing equipment, or even internal devices like pacemakers or medical nanobots. As a result the iDoctor will likely be faster and more accurate in diagnosis than 80% of existing MDs today.
Hence my opening comment. Want to try a taste of the future? Check out Androctor Anna.
]]>

Recently I came across “The Meaning of the 21st Century,” in which he outlines 16 challenges that humanity faces in 21st century. I’ve added comments of my own in Italics.
In my blog I don’t just point out the problems but show how our human inventiveness is finding solutions. Nonetheless, James Martin has pointed out challenges we must face and overcome for humanity and the other travellers on our planet.
]]>