Nuclear has always been a bit different because we started down the path of nuclear energy power stations by going to mega-sized systems. Remember this evolved from the post-WW2 nuclear navy where atomic reactors were being used in submarines. How we got from small to mega is an interesting story in and of itself, and represents a road we probably didn’t need to take. If we can get back to smaller is better and if we bring in new ways of creating reactor fuel (not rods but mini-balls) and if we develop thorium and molten-salt technologies we can create the nuclear energy industry we should have built, not the one we are living with today.
]]>In the article it captured the risks from coal generation: deaths from coal mining, deaths from smog, risks in the transport of coal, it went on. These deaths and events were happening continuously, but in small numbers for any specific event. However, the total deaths were staggering for any given year.
It is one of the problems in human psychology, that lots of small events don’t register, but one big event does. So we will live with train derailments of oil, 10’s of thousands of automobile deaths per year.
The new research in fission with thorium and wave reactors is promising, but I don’t know if it will be enough to keep the positive momentum of nuclear energy continuing in the public’s mind.
]]>