Wrong, fool. It’s an indication that although trained as a scientist, Suzuki doesn’t act like one. And by all outward indications, he doesn’t think like one, either.

But what else might one conclude about somebody who doesn’t really have any credentials in the physical sciences (of which biology & zoology don’t count)? He has no academic credential that supports his (self-)presumption of expertise in physics, or more-specifically, atomic physics or climate.

Your non-responsive deflection is irrelevant. The “article” comes from junk-scientist Suzuki.

Tom Harris is a mechanical engineer and has been doing public relations for the International Climate Science Coalition. H e has a B. Eng and M. Eng in thermofluids and energy sciences. I cannot find any reference to where he received his degrees even on his biography page or from his course history at Carleton University in Ottawa.

Putting “scientist” in quotes I gather is an attempt by you to suggest that David Suzuki has no academic credentials that show that indeed he is a scientist. Suzuki graduated from Amherst College in 1958 with an Honours BA in Biology. He received his PhD in zoology at University of Chicago in 1961. He has worked at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory where he was a research associate. He a faculty member and Professor Emeritus at UBC in Vancouver, British Columbia.

Tom Harris makes the unsupported assertion that “Dr. Suzuki’s statements about me and ICSC are wrong.”

Mr. Harris claims cunudiun’s criticism of his statement are wrong not because of the content of cunudiun’s criticism but because of their source.

Mr. Harris can’t or won’t defend his past statements.

attacked by an the anonyous eco-troll, cunudiun, citing sources set up to discredit anyone who dares dissent from the climate religion. Yes, that is convincing – NOT.

Tom Harris file

Scholars and Rogues
Tom Harris – hypocritical peddler of deceitful climate change editorials
https://scholarsandrogues.com/2015/02/16/tom-harris-hypocritical-peddler-of-deceitful-climate-change-editorials/

Dialogues on Global Warming
Tom Harris – Paid Shill
href=http://dialoguesonglobalwarming.blogspot.ca/2015/07/tom-harris-paid-shill.html

DeSmogBlog
http://www.desmogblog.com/tom-harris

Center for Media and Democracy Sourcewatch
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tom_Harris_(Canadian_engineer/PR_specialist)

Carleton University scandal
In 2012, Tom Harris taught a “climate science” course at Carleton University that was riddled with errors and lies.

Climate Change Denial in the Classroom
(Official CASS critique of the Harris’ Carleton U. course, detailing 149 erroneous claims.)
http://carleycenten.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/CASSREPORTClimateChangeDenialintheClassroom.pdf

CBC News: Climate change skeptic’s university course criticized
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/climate-change-skeptic-s-university-course-criticized-1.1161341

Maclean’s: Professor criticized for course denying climate change – Tom Harris dismisses 142 “corrections”
http://www.macleans.ca/education/uniandcollege/professor-criticized-for-course-denying-climate-change/

The Guardian: Heartland associate taught ‘biased’ climate course at Ottawa university
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/28/heartland-associate-climate-scepticism-ottawa-university

DeSmogBlog: Fake Heartland “Scientist” Infiltrates Canadian University
http://www.desmogblog.com/fake-heartland-scientist-infiltrates-canadian-university

SkepticalScience: Tom Harris’ Carleton University Climate Misinformation Class
http://www.skepticalscience.com/tom-harris-carleton-university-climate-misinformation-class.html

David Suzuki: Climate change denial isn’t about science, or even skepticism
http://www.davidsuzuki.org/blogs/science-matters/2012/03/climate-change-denial-isnt-about-science-or-even-skepticism/

Open Mind (analysis of some of Harris’ false teachings)
http://tamino.wordpress.com/2012/05/09/in-the-classroom/

Deeper background

http://deepclimate.org/2009/12/08/in-the-beginning-the-national-post-terence-corcoran-and-tom-harris/
http://deepclimate.org/2009/12/10/bali-2007-revisited/
http://deepclimate.org/2012/03/08/tom-harris-heartland-and-the-2007-bali-open-letter-to-the-u-n/
http://mikedesouza.com/2012/09/27/feds-discreet-about-foreign-funding-of-climate-skeptics/#more-17
http://web.archive.org/web/20040606164640/http://www.apcoworldwide.com/content/bios/harris.cfm

High school / middle school lesson plan

Today you can find on Harris’ own ICSC website a “lesson plan” for “high school / middle school”, which is fundamentally based on something Harris knows is a lie (unless he just rejects the scientific method outright, which is also a possibility), namely, that there is a “great debate” among climate scientists about whether increases in solar intensity have been mainly responsible for our planet’s ongoing global warming. This is completely false, unless you consider it a “great debate” when one side is nothing but a group of cranks, crackpots, megalomaniacs and thieves in numbers a child could count. Bottom line: Harris taught lie after lie to vulnerable college students in the service of his fossil-fool masters, and now he is pushing for the opportunity to corrupt younger minds.

Suzuki is the same “scientist” who can’t figure out how nuclear power generation works.